the hegemony idea appears similar to marxian false consciousness, and you mention ‘manufacutre of consent’ (chomsky, lippman). obviously the current anarchist milieu along with similar diy, znet and green things, most of which were preceded by similar things in the 60′s (communes, coops etc.) does try to buid new in the shell of the old.
i guess i am just surprised these sorts of ideas are considered new. (i read uri gordon’s thesis and was surprised you get a PhD from oxford on that basis, but i guess alot of poli sci is not exactly much deeper than an acceptable wikipedia article).
i will say that current anarchist type things tend sometimes towards marginality, so they reinforce hegemony in fact. or in terms of anarchy mag’s ‘manifesto’ they are false opposition, or ‘posing’ (fake black bloc rebels who will show up in 10 years like Bill Ayers of the weathermen or Fischer of the German greens—as total members of the establishment who essentially preserve it). even chomsky says his dissent is an example of manufacturing consent to a false democracy.
My name is E. Colin Ruggero. This blog focuses primarily on processes of social change, drawing from politics and culture. The name comes from the work of Antonio Gramsci, a huge influence on my thinking.
Please comment. Feel free to contact me: ecolinr@warofposition.com
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Journal of Youth Studies (2010)Peer groups such as neighbourhoods and hobby circles are important sources of social identity for young people, but their viability is challenged by processes of urbanisation and labour mobility. In recent years, traditional peer groups have been joined by easily accessible computer-mediated groups, which have become an everyda […]
Social Movement Studies: Journal of Social, Cultural and Political Protest, Vol. 9, No. 3. (2010), pp. 235-251.The influence of Foucault on studies of social movements, dissent and protest is not as direct as might be imagined. He is generally regarded as focusing more on the analysis of power and government than forms of resistance. This is reflected in the […]
Social Movement Studies: Journal of Social, Cultural and Political Protest, Vol. 9, No. 3. (2010), pp. 331-340.Kevin Ward, Jenny Pickerill, Danny MacKinnon, David Featherstone […]
the hegemony idea appears similar to marxian false consciousness, and you mention ‘manufacutre of consent’ (chomsky, lippman). obviously the current anarchist milieu along with similar diy, znet and green things, most of which were preceded by similar things in the 60′s (communes, coops etc.) does try to buid new in the shell of the old.
i guess i am just surprised these sorts of ideas are considered new. (i read uri gordon’s thesis and was surprised you get a PhD from oxford on that basis, but i guess alot of poli sci is not exactly much deeper than an acceptable wikipedia article).
i will say that current anarchist type things tend sometimes towards marginality, so they reinforce hegemony in fact. or in terms of anarchy mag’s ‘manifesto’ they are false opposition, or ‘posing’ (fake black bloc rebels who will show up in 10 years like Bill Ayers of the weathermen or Fischer of the German greens—as total members of the establishment who essentially preserve it). even chomsky says his dissent is an example of manufacturing consent to a false democracy.
Thank you.
It is short and complete to articulate basic idea.